Harry Poa' and the Deathly Shallows - Part 2

I thank a very nice comedian I saw lately who gave me a great idea how to call this post. You know, there are some accents around the world dropping a lot of 't' sounds (wha(t)ever), and that made me think about this great idea of raping the name Harry Potter a bit more. You know, 'Shallow' is not terrible enough to describe it.

So, let's start with the usuals. Harry Potter is still trying to kill Voldemort and for that, he is searching some bloody horcruxes. Voldemort finally realizes that his creepy life are about to end... and that's basically all that happens before the end. With a very obvious use of terribly common phrases, editions and just everything... the Harry Potter's 8th film is just a terrible, useless piece of junk.

I don't want to hurt anybody who watched this abnormally overrated thing so many years, but I truly think so many people waste their time and money. In fact, I spent no penny on watching this, and I had nothing better to do (it was this or sleeping). So I feel really really happy and proud of myself that now I'm able to write a review not only about this specific film, but about all the series.

Well, it's hard to find a place to start, but I'll talk about the books one after another, basically discussing their theme to try and express how sad I am for Harry Potter fans out there.

Yes, so the first book was basically a very nice, sweet book about a boy who is different and than he goes to a world where he is at home. That's the dream of every person... and you know what, I hate when people get blind by their feelings. The book is written terribly but it was sweet to serve little kids indeed. However, after the second book, it was pretty clear that Rowling doesn't really have any idea what she WANTS to write about, only generally that the goods win and stuff... The fourth book was the first one that showed a little development. Yay, J.K.Rowling finally got an idea about the plot. Though, the lame thing was that sadly, she used non of her ideas in the 5th book and let us go a bit earlier. No, she started to write about connections and other 'important' stuff in the 6th and 5th without really telling anything specific, just some random 'fact' or something like that (oh, and important people die, that's important you know... to kill characters and that). The 7th book was basically everything all together into a nice packing, some really bad lines and stuff happening. And than everyone dies a bit more... and happy ending with perfect picture of family standing and looking at the horizon. Obviously, with children who were called by long terrible names (I would have killed my family if they had given me such a name). Well, There was a certain theme in each book after the 5th (+1st book), so why not make it... 6 books... or even less.

Remember it this way: There is a boy named Harry, he's the boy who lived. He'll live anyway, because he's the boy who lived, not died. He tries to live normally but there is a guy wanting to kill him... and than Harry meets a few random people and makes some random friends. Random stuff happens... some action stuff... and than Harry has to fights this Voldemot guy with magic he learned in his cool school. When the time comes, Harry knows the most important stuff: There are horcruxes and than when you kill them, the main boss die. On the other hand, there are the cool item that make you a master of death... and this guy he needs to kill tries to get them. But nah, Harry potter is the boy who lived, so he has no problem. Some random action again... (Snape hook up with Harry's mum)... poof... boom... end.

If you never read Harry Potter, I just spoiled you everything you are going to read. Sorry. I am no mean to.

Now, I don't have to tells you that the movies are really trying to stay true to the book... you wont see anything else.

The good point is, like many of you would tell me probably are "the awesome special effects in Harry Potter"... ah, indeed, they are cool... special effects and stuff. My answer will be Casshern.

Can those wonderful action scenes really delete terrible acting preformed by every young actor in those series? it can't. There was one action scene in this Part 2 movie that was ruined from beginning to end because of terrible acting. I don't care a bit about action when the actors act as if they do a 5th grade play.

I wonder if they were the best ones, how were the others. They look like the characters (at least DID before growing up), but the acting point was missed.

I remember for my first play I did this mistake myself, choosing actors that look the same... but I hell hated the fact they were SO not talented and I threw them out and found better ones. I don't hell care -- not talented people shouldn't act. They are like not talented doctors. Do you want to be operated by a doctor who has no idea what he's doing? I don't, maybe you do... than I'll accept you liking them.

I can't express how happy I am that this madness is finally over... no harry potter anymore... I just hope there wont come anything worse that that... I'm too old and tired for that junk all around.

Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides

(ouch?)

Well, I watched this movie as it was still running in our local cinema, but to tell the truth I didn't expect a lot. The Pirates time was over, and like they tried to survive, so this film did.
Basically, I'm really disappointed with Johnny Depp. Not because he did a bad performance -- I actually have to say it was good -- but the whole idea of the film... the lame try to do something out of it... was pretty useless to take part in.
This try only showed many (well, at least myself) that Johnny Depp wasn't the only one making the film so good... but more likely all the bunch of people who took part in it.
What I did like, and didn't at the same time was the idea of Pirates losing control over the world. Yes, it is a historical fact, but at the end... I wanted to see another film with Pirates winning it all and other people should die.
The whole character of Jack Sparrow was put OOC in so many points of the film that I felt really annoyed. I mean, 'fan service' reality.
We wanted to see a girl who he likes... so here she is. Yay -- I would have killed her... she's dumb like a shoe :D.
Anyhow, the story was also pretty chaotic, but I liked the opening content with someone taking Jack Sparrow's identity (really epic and stuff).
But you know, with all of this 'strong' opening, the more the story moved on (aka: love between an idiot and a mermaid)... it turned out to be another terrible cliché.
The Pirates weren't as great as before, the reason for the happening looked like the less important thing in the world.
You know those films where people kill each other, hunt a treasure, search for something... whatever it is -- there is a reason.
Unfortunately... at the end, we discovered there is NO reason. I mean, yeah, people want to be immortal... but what the hell Spain was doing there?
The cast was also not the best you can find, especially the woman Sparrow liked. She is a terrible actress who preforms forcefully and fails to deliver her character. You know what? that's the last person I would have used for that role. In the scenes where the two are together, their acting level is so different you can feel it through every line they say.
Speaking of which -- the script was terrible at certain points. The lines were taken from most common, overrated films and books out there...
I personally died even though I didn't expect anything. For me, I felt like I spent money on something I could have avoided. Too bad.

The Tourist

The movie who passed by and did such a bad impression on my vocabulary that it couldn't stand under the pressure.

Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie? Surprisingly, it was very bad... who would have thought?...
The chemistry between the two actors was, to tell the truth, really bad. For the first impression, you might see a little light in the darkness, but that's only a sweet, too sweet illusion. Oh, by the way, did anyone notice Angelina Jolie isn't able (at all) to create an atmosphere? She's just there to be pretty and wear dresses.
It looked really bad, and the director must die in shame. How can a person, who directs a movie that is going to come to the cinema (maybe it was an accident, I don't know), direct something that looks so bad? I mean, I don't know how much money they put into it, but it looked just a bit better than a movie made by a fan camera... dropping in different places around France.
A big joke actually, some inner joke that shouldn't go out of the 'fanmade' innerhalb I understand though, it's kind of fun for such big actors to take part in that sort of 'fun movie'.
I must pay attention to something Angelina Jolie actually said about her clothes at this movie, "It was odd for me, at first I felt like a little girl dressed up in my mom's clothes', She is right. It looked horrible. They dressed her up and she was always wearing something else. Always. I almost felt creepy about the fact the stylist used her as a moving doll.
I tell you, my first though was about those fanmade films where people just try to put different things and see what comes. Let's say that most of those films are not good, far from being good as well as far from being screened at the cinema.
Speaking about the plot... let's not do it, since it'll become an essay about stupid people and bad writers who believe they are something... Let's just imagine that we'd gone to a movie with a lame script and Russian gangsters all around? Agents? Criminals? Money? oh ya, and really shot cliché lines in between... wouldn't it be sweet?
Nah, that's worth watching only if you're from those who'll spend even 50 dollars on seeing the nose of either of the main actors. Elsewhat? just ignore it, it doesn't even worth it. But I must agree it looked like they had fun making it. Let's clap our hands really high and say -- YES! HAVE FUN PEOPLE. KEEP GIVING US JUNK.

The Sorcerer's Apprentice

(He's coming.)

Yay for movies with Nicolas Cage! I was so way to exited to watch another movie where the awesome super awesome Nucolas Cage takes part! Since the movie where he did it through the end of the world and got not even one wound from it, I've decided to call him 'Nicolas Cage, The Untouchable' (in the spirit of yesterdays anima 'freezing'). No, I'm not serious of course, and I'm even less serious about Nicolas Cage being awesome. He just has this kind of face of... 'what the hell is happening' all the time, that makes me laugh again and again.
So, what was in this film? special effects, physics, Nicolas Cage and some other (not so important) people. I almost believe Nicolas Cage will die in this film, nah, too bad. Now back to being serious, this movie was nothing special but wasn't that half bad for a nowadays movie. It had everything you want: action, cars, sorcerers, witch and a nerd who is in love with a super hot (blone) girl, do you have anything to complain about? well I do, the main guy's acting (no, Nicolas Cage wasn't the main guy) was so bad. I mean, he looked like those poor actors dropped into some crazy unbelievable role. I say, maybe he's suited for high school films, but not for something more than acting like an idiot and doing thingy things with girls (which were the only scenes he could hardly manage around with his character).
Balthazar... ah... I like that name, makes me wanna hug the awesome hair on Nicolas Cage's head. He was pretty nice in the very manly shoes of a sorcerer. However, I was quite disappointed in many aspects, because hell... he can act, in his own way. What has gone through his mind when he stood there and did a completely average job? now I don't like Nicolas Cage anymore, since he's just as anyone else... going with the flow. No, not really, I'll just blame it on this bad made movie. After all, in 'Alice in wonderland' Johnny Depp looked like a total retarded.
Dropping out the very lame jokes and every lame name they gave things ('prime merlinian'?), the plot wasn't even worth watching. It looked like some mix between a horrible American movie about magic and a gangster film.
BUT! -- and I must put this 'but' here, since today I'm really positive because I had a 'pretty day' -- I should say children would enjoy this film (probably), and with your own good sense of humor along (screaming 'omg! that's Nicolas Cage' all the time might be fun as well), this might as well turn out to be pretty funny.
No, not because there's anything about it... just put Nicolas Cage in any possible film and I'll laugh like hell, really, it's something about his face.

The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader

GOD! that was a horrible experience for me... one of the most annoying, paining and making you feel sick things in the world!
It's not that the movie was that bad, but hell, why for heaven's fails would every movie be done in 3D? tell me, what is the thing behind it? don't you have enough imagination in your idiotic brain to feel as if you're in the movie? Are you an idiot? no? I'm happy, since 3D shouldn't be for you than. What the hell wrong with people? don't they try using their brain?
I hate 3D, since I mostly can't watch it anyway, and this was one of the most horrible times I had. I thought for the length of the whole movie that my head is going to explode and I swear I was fighting with myself not to throw up everywhere. So many colors, so many effects... so much 3D... I swear, I'll never make a 3D movie... even if i'll die from hunger. I'm not going to take part in one, and also not going to make any -- if you're too hell dumb to watch, you can die. Really.
Now, since I feel a bit better (my head is spinning like hell, but I'll live), I'll be able to say a little word about the movie itself (since I missed the most part of it, and I'm going to watch it again NOT IN 3D).
It had nice visual effects and interesting action, but the dialogs were horribly output and as I assumed also really rushed. They are going to make more movies anyway, so why bother and rush everything so much?
The actors, sadly, are nothing more than average, as they were before. Sadly, even the main cast didn't improve or anything, they just stayed completely the same.
I must say that Narnia is one of those books I'd like to hit the author really hard for and tell him how much I hate him and want him to suffer. It's so unfair, annoying and disturbing. I like it, no offense, but I don't think that it's a book for  children at all. I remember myself as a child reading the first book and crying for about two weeks, before they took me to the hospital since I said I wont drink anymore.
I wont say they made the movie good enough than, since I had no horrible emotions, I cried a bit in the end... but mostly pained from my head ache. I hate 3D.

Noting to myself again, people are junk. Why? Since every review, every comment and EVERY possible person seeing this movie has compared it to Harry Potter. ARE YOU NUTS PEOPLE?! Harry potter, like I said before, is not your life... maybe you just suffer from a serious complex. Face it, it's not the world. And Narnia was there way before, for example, don't compare it to this junk, please.

Ballet Shoes

I felt really nice watching this movie, actually. It had (somewhat)nice acting, almost well made characters and a few meaningful ideas.
I must agree the beginning was a bit rushed. The first scenes were really charming, but I couldn't get the whole idea without stopping and trying to organize everything in my head. However, as soon as the 'prologue' was over, they smoothly moved into the next time spot.
I must admit the original story was much better, and this adaptation ruined it all. I remember reading it, and yet so much of the movie was made differently. I can't even agree with Emma Watson casted as Pauline, she just can't match the original role. However, despite this fact, when I separate both pieces I had nice time watching it, since it became some sort of childish drama about girls who do random things.
I had different thoughts along the way, I didn't lead my mind into this blank place where every sister had her career and it got into her head. I asked myself questions about relationship between siblings, whether it has something to do with genes or not. I asked myself about the way the women felt, as a person who went through so much at the end. Those parts I found quite amusing.
The only reason I believe the acting was good, was because of some really qualified actors that were in that film, and also the little girl, Posy (I just like that type of acting, and she also danced well, having a really good body language and special movements). Emma Watson proved she can do something a bit different from the idea of Harry Potter, yet she showed no acting skills at all. I guess going with the flow will describe it in the best way (The atmosphere created the "acting").
Some scenes were really lovely, I must admit, as they are. Heartwarming scenes where, for example, Petrova washes the car and talks about her dreams.
Speaking of which, did anyone notice the funny part about Petrova's character? she wanted to go and fly in the sky, yet when she had a chance to fly on the stage she wasn't a bit happy. I guess the way they made her in the movie was weird to me, she had some engineering dream rather than flying.
Despite all the good things I said, and my positive opinion, I must also write that nothing could be more ridiculous than the ending. It felt like they had no idea what to do now, and just randomly did something. That ruined the whole film - believe or not - turning it into a fantasy, fairylike story which may be nice to watch when you're bored or depressed.
I'll sum up saying that's watchable, quite enjoyable if you're doing something in between, since the movie is not really caring away or anything. I had about 7 or 6 breaks in the middle when I did other things as well. Probably that's why I'm feeling too positive about it.
Just watch it to pass the time, I guess. It's comical (quite). It's taking itself too serious.
God, what could three girls do with an avarge to bad acting and horrible directing? relay on us having better things to do?

Ballet Shoes, as said.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Shallows

Finally, I'm getting one of my best chances to say how much I hate Harry Potter, the people who actually think it's good and the woman behind it, because she thinks she's too much. Yes, I guess the idea of a magic school sounded pretty cool at the first place, but unfortunately J.K.Rowling wrote too many books.
I mean, yes, that's pretty cool to sit and read the first book, thinking that maybe you'll be able to leave your reality and find yourself in this magic world she created. No wait, fantasy was created long before Rowling! how shocking! (X.x). If I'll hear ever again, "I like Rowling better than Tolkien", I swear I'll stub this person to death. Not that I like Tolkien that much, I just believe idiots shouldn't exist. If you don't want to reveal your real intelligence quotient, I recommend not saying it in front of intellectuals... they'll just realize you're lying about yourself being 'smart'.
Now about the film, oh dear. I hope no one will kill me after saying it's one of the worse films I've ever seen in my whole life. I mean, beside a few Koreans and Americans junk pieces, I haven't seen such a bad film in a long while.
That goes for any aspect: acting, directing, filming, screen play, original book etc etc.
Like I said before, the idea of the book could be ok, though it was written horribly. I usually never read a book written like some dialog between 13 years old wanna be rebels who tell each other what happened the other day ("she told me... and than we went there... and saw... and than harry said"). However, this time I had to bear it, because sadly it was too famous for me to avoid. I had to read it to the end in order to say, surely, that no line, no idea - nothing - was written good. NO ONE can tell me anymore that I didn't finish this damn book and can't state my opinion.
Anyhow, as a film the last book could be pretty visual, filled with effects and no acting at all, but even that was missing (oh, unlike 'casshern' for example. They just knew what a horrible cast they had and actually faced this fact by creating a 'visual effects' film, not even trying to relay on the actors who just disappeared in the background). So basically, what I'm trying to say is, that the acting (all along the Harry Potter films) was low leveled as ever.
As children, they could still cover up the lack of their talent, but as soon as they grew up the cuteness vanished and anyone, who has any common sense, could tell they are pretty horrible. Well, other actors sell as well, since they're so hot. I guess that doesn't matter at all... acting... and talent, nah, who cares about those nowadays?
What disturbed me the most, was the fact that they do too many actions, or too less. Have you EVER seen a person argue with another, and in order to say a line he has to go across the room to the other side and say what he had on his mind?
And what about people who stand there, watching you, and just wait for you and your friend to tell bad stuff about one another... until they have their line to speak? I recommend watching the film again, with my point in your mind... you'll finally notice their acting is horrible. Face it, people, when you say something, no matter what, you have something you want to 'say' with your 'lines'. Same goes for the characters you play, they have the 'undertext'. What are you trying to say? don't think. Just feel. If you can't, just stop trying to act something... you'll just make a fool out of yourself.
Going back to the scene that so annoyed me in this film, I'm talking about the argue of Ron and Harry. I thought at first, when I saw it before the film, that it's a 'pre-production' scene that had nothing to do with the movie. But I was pretty wrong, actually. Without cutting anything out, they just played the scene as it is... making it look like a scene from some project of a (terrible, with no talent at all) team in the finals of the filming courses. I can actually show you this scene from another movie, 20 minutes long, took before the graduation of a person I knew. Might be funny to compare.
I just don't get how Shallow this movie went with all the fights because of envy... did I miss it in the book? or it wasn't there at all? Not bothered enough to look, I'm not that bored.
The point above just made it look like a really bad filmed teen, something, comedy, with low leveled romance and some dumb jokes (oh yes, Ron being kissed by a lady that thinks he's her husband. Hahaha... not).
Speaking of kisses, haven't harry potter kissed any possible girl in the whole films set? The scene with Harry and Hermione was completely stupid, in my eyes. Was it really everything that Ron saw there? That's just plain dumb... I'd say. Wouldn't be 'The Worse Nightmare' for me (or any other HUMAN).

"We've wondered what is it".
"What is it? well, the sign of the deathly hallows, of course".
"The what?".
"The deathly hallows".

 Like seen above, the script is really 'seriously' thought of, indeed. Doesn't it sound great to speak like this in real life? I'd find such a thing completely dumb and laugh, probably. Once, I've tried to write a '20 minutes' script to a play that lasted 2 hours (original). I wanted to preform it in a festival. In the end, I gave up on it, since I actually can admit (unlike some of us, apparently) it failed. Now find the Similarities.
It sounded actually like the book at some parts (which is not a compliment, since the book was so horrible), and the scenes seemed rushed and unorganized. Everything happened so fast and unrealistic, that made me sad. Not that I like Harry Potter, it just made me sad I'm wasting my time on watching such a junk only to put my ideals in place. No one will be able to tell me now, that this movie -- compared to the others -- was good. It wasn't.
What I did like, and could see it coming though, was the 'visual tale' that was made with animation. That was a good pick from the first place, because animation can show in many cases what other things can't show. I liked the feeling it delivered, and was pretty sad to go back to the film.
The ending was obvious, and everything went pretty obvious in the way the scenes were made, that's why I'm not appreciating the director at all. Even though I didn't expect much from the movie, or more likely I expected it to be too horrible to watch, yet I was dissapointed. Can you imagine how bad it was?
I'm starting to get the feeling that every film from now on, and every book as well will be really horrible. Why you ask? well, I haven't seen too many things from the past two years that were anything worthy to watch. It feels like humans forgot quality. Talented people who will make a breakthrough can't be found anywhere.
For the first time, pretty much, I feel completely lost and sad, as for the future of the sinking cultures that become one with the American industrylike idea. Everything, just one after another, loses it's wonderful concept and meaning.
Who really cares that Harry Potter is so horrible? It earned so much money. Who cares that children will read such a horrible book as Harry Potter? They don't read anything else anyway.
I don't want to think how this world will look in the future with no changes...I don't want to see the world so low. Let's just make a change and stop this madness, and try to make good pieces, and work hard to make everything better.
Because making something 'worth watching' for the humanity, means underestimating it. It means you don't believe those idiots, out there, on the streets, can read and watch good things too.
Just try it people, try making better things... and than the quality of the society, thinking and ideas will grow wider and wider.
I think that will be all for today, I'm happy I said what I had about this movie, about people in general and stated my mind. I guess most of you might say it's only my point of view, and that you enjoy movies with really good looking guys or girls... but take a deep breath and think. Think, if you can.